This page has two jobs. First, it explains every line printed on the panel of the bottle we sell, what each ingredient is, and what the research does and does not say about it, including who was in each trial, at what dose and who paid for it. Second, and this is the part most advertising pages leave out, it lists the headlines we run, tells you which ones are exaggerated, and separates the small number of things that are genuinely supported by evidence from the many that are not.
You almost certainly arrived here from an advertisement. The headline you clicked was written by us and paid for by us to appear next to real news stories. It was designed to make you stop scrolling. Several of our headlines overstate what science actually shows, and a few attribute statements to doctors who do not exist.
Everything on this site is a paid advertisement for a product we sell. If you buy through a link on any of our pages, we are paid a commission. That is the reason this site exists.
The product is an emulsified fish oil: oil from anchovy, sardine and mackerel, blended with water and gums, flavored with orange and vanilla and sweetened with xylitol, sold in a 15.2-fluid-ounce squeeze bottle by BrainMD of Irvine, California as a dietary supplement. The serving is one tablespoon, 15.9 grams, and there are thirty of them in a bottle. Each tablespoon carries 1.9 grams of omega-3 fatty acids: 910 milligrams of EPA, 590 milligrams of DHA and 370 milligrams of other omega-3s, plus 4 grams of xylitol, 70 calories and 5 grams of fat. It is not a medicine, it is not meant for any medical condition, and no study has ever tested this bottle. The benefits printed on the label are the maker's wording, not findings, and the label carries the standard statement that its claims have not been evaluated by the FDA. No food, drink or supplement on this page is a substitute for your own clinician.
If you are genuinely worried about your memory, the single most useful thing you can do is book an appointment with your own clinician. That costs you nothing from us, and a proper conversation about sleep, hearing, the medicines you take and your daily habits is worth more than anything we are selling. We would rather you close this page and make that call than buy something under a false impression.
These are the headlines we have run, grouped by the claim they make. The right-hand column is our own plain assessment. We have marked each family of headlines as Exaggerated, Partly true, Withdrawn, Our headline was wrong or Broadly supported.
| The headline as you saw it | What is actually behind it |
|---|---|
| "Mental Decline Begins When Seniors Can't Spell These 3 Words. Test Now""Top Doctors Say Mental Decline Begins When Seniors Can't Pronounce These 3 Phrases. Can You?""MDs Say Mental Decline Begins When Seniors Can't Pronounce These 3 Phrases. Can You?""Memory Decline Begins When Seniors Say These 3 Phrases (See The List)""Declining Memory Begins When Seniors Say These 7 Phrases. See Which Ones" | Exaggerated There is no set of three words, three phrases or seven phrases whose spelling or pronunciation marks the beginning of anything. Nothing "begins" at a word. Word tasks do appear inside the short memory checks clinicians use, but those checks are given in person and read alongside your history, your medicines and your age. Failing a word online means nothing on its own: plenty of people stumble over a word when they are tired, nervous or being timed. "Top doctors" and "MDs" refer to no specific doctor. See section 4. |
| "Japan's Oldest Doctors Say Memory Loss Isn't Age: Just Avoid Drinking These 3 Beverages""Japan's Greatest Doctors Say Memory Loss Isn't Age: Just Avoid Drinking These 3 Beverages""Japan's Oldest Doctors Say Memory Loss Isn't Age: Just Avoid Eating These 3 Foods""Japan's Oldest Doctors Say Memory Loss Isn't Age: Just Stop Eating These 3 Foods" | Exaggerated No group of Japanese doctors issued this statement. There is no such panel, no such list, and no source we can point you to. Japan appears in the headline because it is widely associated with long life and with a diet heavy in oily fish, which makes the claim feel credible. That is a marketing decision, not a citation. The second half is also wrong. Memory changes with age for everyone, and no diet removes that. What is true is narrower: certain long-term drinking and eating patterns travel with faster slippage on thinking tests in large population studies. [1] [2] Association is not proof of cause, and "just avoid these three" is not how any of it works. |
| "Nobel Prize's Doctors Say Memory Loss Isn't Age: Just Stop Eating These 3 Foods" | Withdrawn We retract this one outright. No Nobel laureate has endorsed this page, this product, or any list of three foods on our behalf. Attaching the Nobel Prize to an advertisement implies an authority that does not exist and we should not have run it. |
| "The Overlooked Boxed Cereal Now Tied to 8 Out of 10 Memory Cases" | Our headline was wrong There is no such statistic. No study ties any cereal to eight out of ten cases of anything, "memory cases" is not a category any researcher uses, and no cereal has been "overlooked" by anyone: the sugar figure is printed on the side of every box. The number was invented for the headline and we withdraw it. The grain of truth is the same as for the other cereal headlines below: a diet heavy in ultra-processed food, the sweet cereal shelf included, travels in a large Brazilian study with somewhat faster slippage on thinking tests over eight years. [2] That is a modest association across thousands of people, not eight in ten of anyone. See section 3. |
| "Brain Experts Now Say These 3 Cereals Age the Brain Faster Than Time""Scientists Now Say This 1 Cereal Ages the Brain Faster Than Time" | Exaggerated No food ages the brain "faster than time." That phrase was written for effect and it is not a finding from any study. It is also internally inconsistent: in one version it is three cereals, in another it is one, because the number is something we test for click-through, not something we measured. The grain of truth: diets high in ultra-processed food are associated with somewhat faster slippage on thinking tests over years. [2] That is a modest effect across a population, not a fate sealed by a bowl of cereal. See section 3. |
| "Doctors Now Say This Popular Evening Drink Is Behind Memory Loss""Doctors Now Say This Popular Evening Drink Is Behind Brain Health Decline" | Partly true The "evening drink" is alcohol, and of everything our ads point at, this is where the evidence is strongest. In 550 British civil servants followed for thirty years, higher drinking went with shrinkage of the hippocampus, the region most involved in forming memories, and with faster decline in word fluency; light drinkers had no edge over people who did not drink at all. [1] What is overstated is the word "behind." Alcohol is one contributing factor among many, not the cause of memory slips. Cutting back is a genuinely good idea. It is also worth saying plainly: the fish oil we sell contains no alcohol and no caffeine. |
| "Doctors Name 5 Popular Drinks Now Tied To Memory Decline. Coffee Tops The List""Seniors: These 4 Drinks May Be Aging Your Brain Faster""The 4 Drinks Brain Doctors Want Seniors to Quit""Neurologists Say Cognitive Decline Isn't Age: Just Stop Drinking These 2 Popular Drinks""Doctors: 3 Popular Drinks Now Tied to Memory Loss in Seniors" | Exaggerated Notice that the count changes: two drinks, three, four, five. It changes because it is an advertising variable we rotate, not a number that came out of a study. No neurologist is named in any version, because none was consulted. "Coffee tops the list" is the clearest thing we have got wrong: none of the studies on this page is about plain black coffee. If you drink coffee and enjoy it, this headline gave you a reason to worry that the evidence does not support. The product we sell contains no caffeine and no alcohol, so nothing about it asks you to give up your cup. See section 2. |
| "Brain Doctors: Quit These 4 Drinks Before It's Too Late" | Exaggerated No brain doctor was consulted for this headline, and there is no "too late." The deadline was invented to make you click. The four drinks are the ones in section 2: alcohol, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, sweetened bottled teas and sweetened coffee-shop drinks. Cutting back on them is sensible for your sleep and your wallet, and heavy drinking travels with poorer word-fluency scores over years. [1] There is no evidence that quitting them on any particular day changes anything about your memory, and there is no age after which the change stops being worth making. See section 2. |
| "Memory Slipping? Check These 4 Everyday Drinks First" | Partly true Half right, in the wrong order. If your memory is slipping, the first thing to check is not a drink; it is a conversation with your own clinician about sleep, hearing and the medicines you take, none of which is changed by what you pour. The four drinks are the everyday ones in section 2. Reviewing them is a reasonable second step, mostly for sleep. Not enough plain water belongs on the list too. See section 2. |
| "America's Top Experts Say Mental Decline Isn't Aging: Just Avoid These 5 Kitchen Drinks" | Exaggerated The same construction as the "Japan's doctors" headline above, with the country changed. No panel of American experts issued this statement, and we cannot point you to one. Memory changes with age, and no drink removes that. The five kitchen drinks are alcohol, sugar-sweetened sodas, diet sodas, sweetened bottled teas and sweetened coffee-shop drinks, all in section 2, where the honest version of each is written out. "Just avoid" overstates what any of that evidence shows. See section 2. |
| "Still Sharp at 90? Seniors Are Rethinking These 3 Everyday Foods" | Partly true The gentlest of our headlines, and still an overstatement. Nobody knows what keeps a particular person sharp at 90, and no single food does it. The three everyday foods are sugary breakfast cereals, processed meats and packaged baked goods, all in section 3. Eating less of them is part of the long, slow habits in section 5, and no food is a promise at any age. See sections 3 and 5. |
| "Drink one spoonful a day and watch your memory change""One spoon a day is all it takes" | Exaggerated The spoon is real and the dose on the panel is real; the promise is not. Three large randomized trials gave healthy older adults this much omega-3 a day or more and found nothing on memory or thinking: a 2012 Cochrane review of three trials in 3,536 adults over 60, [3] an 18-month trial of 390 adults aged 65 to 90 on 2.3 grams a day, [4] and a three-year trial of 2,157 adults over 70 on 1 gram a day. [5] A 2015 pooled analysis did find better episodic memory with DHA above 1 gram a day, but in adults who already had mild memory complaints, [6] and a 2018 review of 51 trials calls the whole question unresolved. [7] "Watch your memory change" should not have been written. See sections 6 and 7. |
| "Thirty Spoonfuls, One Month, and Sixty Days That Change When You Open It" | Broadly supported Every figure in this headline is printed on the label or in the seller's posted return policy, and you can check each one before you buy. The panel gives the serving as one tablespoon of 15.9 grams, thirty servings to the 15.2-fluid-ounce bottle, with 910 milligrams of EPA and 590 of DHA, which is the 1,500 milligrams the front of the label promises. The seller's return policy gives sixty days from purchase: an unopened bottle is refunded at the product price, less shipping, and an opened bottle earns store credit up to the original amount, with return postage paid by the customer in both cases. The headline is meant to state a count and a condition, not to raise expectations. It is not a claim that the oil works. |
| "Neurologists Name 5 Popular Prescriptions Now Tied to Memory Decline" | Partly true, and the one not to act on alone No neurologist named a list for us, and we will not print one. What is true is that pharmacists keep lists of everyday medicines, some sold over the counter for allergies and for the night, that are often a poor fit after 65, and that a yearly look at everything you take is worth having. But an advertisement is the worst possible reason to change a medicine: never stop or change one because of something you read in an ad, including ours. Put everything you take in one bag, this bottle included, and ask your pharmacist. See the box at the end of section 2. |
An honest answer: these headlines appear beside real news stories, competing for attention with everything else on the page, and dramatic phrasing gets clicked. That is the incentive, and we are subject to it like every other advertiser.
It is also why this page exists. Once you are here, you are entitled to know exactly which claims we can stand behind and which ones were written to get your attention. Everything below is the sober version.
Our headlines have referred, in different versions, to "3 beverages", "4 drinks", "5 popular drinks", "2 popular drinks" and "this popular evening drink" without ever naming them. Here is the complete list of what we were pointing at, and what the research actually supports for each one. Where a study is cited, it is observational unless stated otherwise: it can show that two things travel together in a population, not that one causes the other.
This is the "popular evening drink" · Best-supported of the group
What the research says. A thirty-year study of 550 British civil servants found that higher drinking, even at moderate levels, went with shrinkage of the hippocampus and faster decline in word fluency, and that light drinkers had no advantage over people who did not drink at all. [1] Alcohol also disrupts sleep and interacts with many medicines.
Honest verdict. Of everything on this list, cutting back on alcohol has the strongest case behind it. It is still not "the cause" of memory slips, and no amount of cutting back is a promise.
About the product we sell. It contains no alcohol and no caffeine. It is a tablespoon of emulsified fish oil, taken once a day.
Important. If you drink heavily every day, do not stop abruptly on your own. Ask your clinician how to cut back safely.
Part of the "3 popular drinks" and "4 drinks" · Partly supported
What the research says. Soft drinks sit on the ultra-processed shelf, and in a Brazilian study of 10,775 adults followed for a median of eight years, the people who ate and drank the most from that shelf slipped about a quarter faster on thinking tests than those who consumed the least. [2]
Honest verdict. A reasonable thing to cut down on, mostly for reasons that have nothing to do with a dramatic headline. Replacing them with water is a cheap, low-risk change.
Often the "surprising" drink in our ads · No evidence we can stand behind
What the research says. We are not aware of a study that gives a clear answer about diet soft drinks and everyday memory, and we cite none here.
Honest verdict. Unresolved, and not a reason to panic. Anyone who tells you diet soda has been shown to harm your memory is going beyond the evidence.
About the product we sell. It is sweetened with xylitol, a sugar alcohol, at four grams per tablespoon, which is why the label can print no sugar and why the bottle has to stay away from dogs. [8]
Part of the "3 beverages" · Partly supported
What the research says. Same story as the soft drinks above: the sugar is the issue, not the tea or the fruit. Whole fruit behaves quite differently from fruit juice, which delivers the sugar without the fiber. [2]
Honest verdict. Treat these as soft drinks, because nutritionally that is largely what they are. The oil we sell is taken by the spoon; stirring it into a sweetened drink simply adds the sugar back.
The version of "coffee" our ads should have named · Partly supported
What the research says. These are sugary drinks that happen to contain coffee. Whatever applies to sugar-sweetened beverages applies to them. A large flavored frappé can carry as much added sugar as a soft drink. [2]
Honest verdict. If our "coffee" headline had meant this, it would have been defensible. It did not, and we should have been specific.
Named in our headline as the worst offender · Our headline was wrong
What the research says. None of the studies on this page is about ordinary black coffee or plain tea, and tea is a routine part of the eating patterns studied for memory. Caffeine late in the day can spoil your night, so timing matters more than the drink itself. The fish oil we sell contains no caffeine at all.
Honest verdict. "Coffee Tops The List" was a bad headline. If you drink coffee, enjoy it, and it does not keep you awake, the evidence does not ask you to give it up.
Never in our headlines, and it should have been · Worth more than the list above
What the research says. There is no trial we can cite saying a glass of water improves anybody's memory, and we are not going to invent one. What is true is that thirst blunts attention and concentration long before anyone thinks to blame it, and that replacing a sweet drink with water removes the sugar from the ultra-processed column. [2]
Honest verdict. The dullest line in this section and the cheapest change on it. It costs nothing and requires nothing we sell.
We do not print a list of medicines, and you should not act on one from an advertisement. Do not stop, reduce or skip anything a clinician gave you because of this page or any of our headlines.
The right action is simple: put every medicine, vitamin and over-the-counter product you take into one bag, this bottle included, and take it to your pharmacist. Ask: "Is anything here a poor choice at my age, and does a gram and a half of omega-3 fats a day sit well beside it?" That last question is worth asking in its own right if you take anything that thins the blood or have an operation booked, because omega-3 fats at gram doses can affect bleeding.
The food headlines referred to "3 foods" and to "cereals": one cereal in some versions, three in others. Again, the number was ours, not a finding. Here is what was meant, and what stands behind it.
The "3 cereals" / "1 cereal" that "age the brain faster than time" · Partly supported
What the research says. Frosted, honey-coated and chocolate cereals are mostly refined starch and added sugar, and many carry more sugar per serving than a cookie. They sit on the ultra-processed shelf that travels with faster slippage on thinking tests over years. [2] No study has found that any cereal "ages the brain faster than time." That phrase is ours and it is not defensible. In the Framingham families, 1,391 adults whose everyday food carried more choline, which is eggs, milk, meat and beans, scored better on verbal and visual memory tests. [9]
Honest verdict. Reading the sugar figure on the box is a sensible habit. Plain oats, plain shredded wheat and unsweetened whole-grain cereals are inexpensive swaps, and eggs, milk and beans are where that study's choline came from.
The honest version of all our food headlines · Partly supported
What the research says. A large Brazilian cohort found that adults with the highest intake of ultra-processed foods slipped about 28 per cent faster on overall thinking tests, and 25 per cent faster on tests of planning, over roughly eight years than those who ate the least. [2] This is observational, the effect size was modest in absolute terms, and diet is tangled up with income, education and dozens of other factors.
Honest verdict. The pattern of your eating over years matters more than any single food. That is a duller message than "these 3 foods", which is exactly why our headlines do not say it.
Usually one of the "3 foods" · Partly supported
What the research says. Processed meats are part of the ultra-processed shelf in the study above. [2]
Honest verdict. Worth moderating. Not an emergency, and not undone by any supplement or any spoonful.
Usually one of the "3 foods" · Partly supported
What the research says. Fast food sits on the same shelf, and the same study applies. [2]
Honest verdict. Same as above: pattern over years, not any one meal.
The refined-carbohydrate group · Partly supported
What the research says. The eating pattern most studied for memory is the MIND pattern: leafy greens, berries, beans, nuts, whole grains, olive oil and fish. In a three-year randomized trial of 604 older adults, the group that ate that way and a group that simply ate a little less both improved their thinking scores, by about the same amount. [10]
Honest verdict. The useful advice was never "stop eating these 3 foods." It is "shift the overall pattern", which takes months and cannot be sold in a headline.
The food our own product is made of · The one to put on the list
What the research says. Oily fish is the food source of the two fats in the bottle we sell, EPA and DHA, and it is part of the MIND and Mediterranean patterns studied for memory. [10] Two portions a week puts most people in the same weekly range of EPA and DHA as a daily tablespoon of this oil, at the price of a tin of sardines. That said, the randomized trials of the isolated fats in healthy older adults have mostly found nothing. [3] [4] [5]
Honest verdict. If you are going to change one thing on the strength of any of our headlines, make it this one, and make it the fish rather than the bottle. Our product is a convenient way to get the same fats on the days you do not cook fish; it is not a better one.
Drink less alcohol. Drink less sugar. Keep your coffee, earlier in the day if it costs you your night, and drink more plain water. Eat more like the MIND or Mediterranean pattern (vegetables, whole grains, beans, nuts, olive oil, fish, berries) and less like a vending machine, and put oily fish on the table twice a week. Every one of those changes costs nothing extra, and none of them requires anything we sell.
Several of our headlines invite you to test yourself on words or phrases: spell these three words, pronounce these three phrases, see whether you say these seven phrases. There is no such validated test, and we cannot give you a real one, because a real one does not work that way.
What an actual memory check looks like. Clinicians use short structured checks. They do include word tasks: recalling three unrelated words after a delay, naming animals, repeating a sentence. But three things make them different from an online quiz:
These checks also produce false alarms. Poor sleep, trouble hearing, being in discomfort and simply being nervous all lower scores in people whose memory is fine. This is precisely why an online word quiz is meaningless: it has none of the context that makes the real check useful.
We are sorry. Take it as a prompt rather than a verdict: if the worry is real, bring it to your own clinician and ask for a proper memory check. If it was just a startling headline, the reassurance you are looking for cannot come from a quiz on an advertising page, including this one.
If we only had one section to be useful in, this would be it. None of these is a supplement, a bottle, or a list of three foods, and none of them can be sold to you by us.
These are unglamorous. They cannot be delivered in a headline, they take years, and they are, by a wide margin, the most useful things on this entire page.
What is in one tablespoon of BrainMD Omega-3 Power Squeeze, what each line is, and what the cited research says about it, including who was in each trial, at what dose and what the trial measured. The serving is one tablespoon of 15.9 grams and there are thirty in a bottle. The panel prints 1.9 grams of omega-3 fatty acids per tablespoon: 910 milligrams of EPA, 590 of DHA and 370 of other omega-3s, together with 70 calories, 5 grams of fat and 4 grams of xylitol. The other ingredients are water, glycerine, gum arabic, flavorings, citric acid, xanthan and guar gums, an antioxidant blend of vitamin E with rosemary extract, ascorbyl palmitate and green tea extract, beta carotene and sorbic acid. The oil comes from anchovy, sardine and mackerel, so the product is not for anyone with a fish allergy. Where a study is cited below, it used fish oil or DHA at a measured dose in other people; none of it tested this bottle.
The two long-chain omega-3 fats of oily fish (salmon, sardines, anchovies, mackerel, herring). DHA is a building block of nerve-cell membranes; EPA is a precursor of signaling molecules. Supplements come as fish oil, krill oil, algal oil or, in RELEVATE, herring roe phospholipids.
Traditional and everyday use. Fish has been eaten for brain and heart for as long as there have been fishermen; fish-oil supplements date from the 1980s.
What the research says. The randomized trials in healthy older adults are mostly null: a 2012 Cochrane review of three trials in 3,536 people over 60 found no difference from placebo on mental-status scores or on word learning, digit span and verbal fluency;[3] an 18-month trial of 390 adults aged 65 to 90 taking 2.3 g a day of DHA-rich fish oil found no benefit and a small negative effect on psychomotor speed;[4] and the three-year DO-HEALTH trial found no effect of 1 g a day on a cognitive screening score.[5] A 2015 meta-analysis did find that DHA, alone or with EPA, improved episodic memory in adults with mild memory complaints, and that doses above 1 g a day helped episodic memory regardless of baseline.[6] One 24-month trial of 60 adults over 65 combining 1 g of fish oil with carotenoids and vitamin E found fewer working-memory errors.[11] A 2018 review of 51 trials concluded the question is still open.[7]
Amount per serving in Omega-3 Power Squeeze. 1.9 g total omega-3 (1,500 mg of EPA plus DHA per tablespoon)
Good to know. Fishy burps and loose stools are the common complaints. Doses above about 3 g a day can affect bleeding: ask a pharmacist if you take blood thinners or have an operation planned. Fish allergy excludes fish-derived products.
A sugar substitute, a sugar alcohol about as sweet as table sugar, made from plant fibre (birch wood or corn cobs) and used in sugar-free gum, mints, candy, baked goods, toothpaste, mouthwash, vitamins and dietary supplements. [8]
Traditional and everyday use. A sweetener, nothing more. In the Focus Brain spray it is the second ingredient by weight after water and gives the "energy-drink" taste without sugar or caffeine.
What the research says. Nothing to cite for memory or attention; it is a sweetener.
Amount per serving in Omega-3 Power Squeeze. 4 g (sweetener; keep away from dogs)
Good to know. Large amounts are laxative; the product's own label says so, and five sprays a day is a small amount. Xylitol is dangerous to dogs: the FDA warns that in a dog it is absorbed quickly and can trigger a potent insulin release and a rapid, profound drop in glucose within 10 to 60 minutes, whereas in people it does not stimulate insulin. [8] Keep the bottle where the dog cannot get it.
A fat-soluble vitamin that works as an antioxidant in cell membranes. The label form, d-alpha tocopherol acetate, is the natural form of the vitamin with an acetate group attached to make it stable in a liquid. Nuts, seeds, vegetable oils, spinach and avocado are the usual food sources.
What the research says. In the Women's Health Study, 6,377 generally healthy women aged 65 or older took 600 IU of vitamin E on alternate days for up to 9.6 years and gained no cognitive benefit over placebo.[12] That amount is many times the 7.5 mg in this product, so the trial says nothing in favour of the label amount either.
Amount per serving in Omega-3 Power Squeeze. not quantified (preserves the oil; not a vitamin dose)
Good to know. At high supplemental doses vitamin E can interfere with vitamin K and raise the risk of bleeding, which matters if you take anything that thins the blood; the amount here is modest. The upper limit for adults is 1,000 mg a day. Talk to your doctor before use if you take anything daily.
*These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. This information does not constitute medical advice and it should not be relied upon as such. This product is not a substitute for medication or other treatment prescribed by a physician or health care provider. Consult your doctor before starting any dietary supplement.
Set against the headlines that brought you here, this is the complete and honest position.
Things we cannot promise, and that nobody selling you a supplement can:
Things we can say honestly:
No. Those attributions are advertising language. No named or identifiable expert made those statements, and none has endorsed this product.
None of the studies on this page is about plain coffee, and our "Coffee Tops The List" headline overstated it. What is worth watching is added sugar in coffee drinks, and caffeine late enough in the day to spoil your night. The fish oil we sell contains no caffeine.
No. Not on your own, and not because of an advertisement. Take everything you take to your pharmacist and ask whether anything is a poor fit for your age.
One tablespoon holds 910 milligrams of EPA and 590 of DHA, 1,500 together, plus 370 milligrams of other omega-3s. The trials in older adults used between one and two and a half grams a day, so it is in the same range. [3] [4] [5] At that range, in healthy adults over 65, those trials found nothing for memory or thinking. The pooled analysis with a signal was in adults who already noticed their memory slipping, above a gram a day. [6]
Yes, and the eating patterns with the most research behind them include fish. [10] Two portions of oily fish a week puts most people in a similar weekly range of EPA and DHA, and it costs less than the bottle.
Not for a person at four grams a spoonful; sugar alcohols upset some stomachs at far higher doses. For a dog it is a real hazard: the FDA says xylitol is absorbed quickly in dogs and can cause a rapid, deep drop in their glucose within ten to sixty minutes. [8] Keep the bottle on a high shelf with the cap closed.
The seller's 323 published reviews average 4.85 stars and almost all of them are about the taste and texture rather than about memory. Three of them, including one that gave four stars, are quoted on the page you came from, and not one of them claims anything about memory.
You have sixty days from purchase. Unopened, the product price is refunded less shipping; opened, you receive store credit up to the original amount; return postage is yours either way. You cannot taste it first and still be refunded to your card.
It is sold by BrainMD of Irvine, California. The brand carries the name and the medical credential of the person who founded it, and we do not use either of them as an argument, because a credential on a label is not evidence about a bottle.
A fair question. Do not take our word for it. The references below are real, published sources you can look up yourself, and nothing in sections 4 and 5 requires you to buy anything or trust us. If this page and our headlines disagree, believe this page.
No. There is nothing to sign up for, and you are welcome to read it, close the tab and never come back.
Yes, and you should. Every numbered reference below can be found by searching its authors and journal. For general information, the National Institute on Aging (nia.nih.gov) publishes plain-language material and sells nothing.
These are the sources behind the claims marked with a number above. Several are observational studies, which can show association but not cause. The omega-3 trials are randomized and mostly found nothing at this dose in healthy older adults; the pooled analysis with a signal concerns adults who already had memory complaints; the two-year trial with a small effect combined a lower dose of fish oil with two other nutrients; the xylitol source is a government consumer notice rather than a study. None of them tested this bottle. We have deliberately not cited anything for the claims we describe as exaggerated, because there is nothing to cite.
Citing a study does not mean the study is about this product. The trials above tested one fat, or one combination, in other people, at doses this spoonful matches only in part, not the bottle itself; none of the research tested BrainMD Omega-3 Power Squeeze, and none of it supports it.
This site is an advertising publication. The Afternoon Post is not a news organization, is not affiliated with any news outlet whose page our advertisements appear on, and is not affiliated with the National Institutes of Health, the Nobel Foundation, the Food and Drug Administration, or any medical body, university or government agency named on this page. Logos and names of publishers appear in our reporting dashboards only to describe where advertisements were placed; they imply no endorsement whatsoever.
The product on this site is sold by BrainMD of Irvine, California. Headlines used in our advertising are promotional and may be dramatized, generalized or exaggerated for attention. Where a headline conflicts with this page, this page is correct. Individual results, testimonials and endorsements do not represent typical results. We are compensated when readers purchase products through our links.
Medical disclaimer. Nothing on this page is medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Do not delay seeking professional advice, and do not stop or change any medicine a clinician gave you, because of anything you read here. If you are worried about memory or concentration, your own or a family member's, speak to a qualified healthcare professional. In an emergency, call your local emergency number.